|
|
Building a Web Site
of Your Own |
Copyright
and the Teacher: Key Points
Why is Copyright Law so
vague? Copyright law (1976) was made intentionally vague so that it could be flexible
and apply as new technologies developed. This vagueness means that clear and easy
answers to some questions may not be possible. Still, there are
important implications for teachers and library media specialists that must be
considered. Case law has already established some of these guiding
principles. This page provides a summary of some of those principles - for
more information, to consult additional excellent sources:
The Copyright Primer for Librarians and Educators,
(2nd edition, 1995 published by ALA and NEA) by Janis Bruwelheide.
Getting
Permission: How to License and Clear Copyrighted Materials Online
& Off, (nolo, 2000) by Richard Stim
Topics covered here are:
Also, we suggest
a check of information about copyright issues Beyond
the Classroom and additional source links to address non-classroom issues.
Fair Use
The stated purpose of the copyright law is to protect the rights of
creators/authors, encourage their continued work, and to encourage others to engage in
scholarly pursuits. At times, this means we are allowed to use information from
other sources in education when such use by non-educators would be prohibited. Here
are a few key points from Section 107 of the copyright code regarding fair use:
The nature of a copyrighted work includes the degree to which it is
factual - copying or using factual information is more likely to be fair use.
A second important consideration is whether the copying has some effect
on marketability of the original work
Section 107
...the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in
copies of phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section (sec 106), for
purpose such as criticism, comment, news, teaching (including multiple copies for
classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In
determining whether tue use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the
factors to be considered shall include--
- the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a
commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
- the nature of the copyrighted work;
- the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted
work as a whole; and
- the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted
work.
The fact that such a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair
use if such a finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
Back to top of page.
Photocopying
The copyright law has been revised approximately every 50 years, The most recent
revision (1976) includes the following agreement on photocopying for classroom use.
This is a minimum standard, other things may also be permissible.
- Single Copying for Teachers - A single copy may be made of any of the following
by or for a teacher at his or her individual request for his or her scholarly research or
use in teaching or preparation to teach a class:
- a chapter from a book;
- an article from a periodical or newspaper;
- a short essay or short poem, whether or not from a collective work;
- a chart, graph, diagram, drawing, cartoon, or picture from a book, periodical, or
newspaper.
- Multiple Copies for classroom use - Multiple copies (not to exceed in any event
more than one copy per pupil in a course) may be made by or for the teacher giving the
course for classroom use or discussion, provided that:
- the copying meets the tests of brevity and spontaneity as defined below; and
- meets the dumulative effect test as defined below; and,
- each copy includes a notice of copyright.
Definitions
Brevity
Poetry: (a) a complete poem if less than 250 words and if
printed on not more than two pages, or (b) from a longer poem an exceprt of not more than
250 words.
Prose: (a) either a complete article, story or essay
of less than 2,500 words, or (b) an excerpt from any prose work of not more than 1,000
words or 10 percent of the work, whichever is less, but in any event a minimum of 500
words.
Illustration: One chart, graph, diagram, drawing, cartoon
or picture per book or per periodical issue.
"Special" works: Certain works in poetry, prose
or in "poetic prose" which often combines language with illustrations and which
are intended sometimes for children and at other times for a more general audience fall
short of 2,500 words in entirity. Paragraph (ii) above notwithstanding, such
"special works" may not be reporduced in their entirity; however an excerpt
comprising not more than two of the published pages of such special work and containing
not more than 10 percent of the words found in the text thereof, may be
reporduced.
Sponteneity
The copying is at the instance and inspiration of the individual
teacher, and
The inspriation and decision to use the work and the moment of
its use for maximum teaching effectiveness are so close in time that it would be
unreasonable to expect a timely reply to a request for permission.
Cumulative Effect
the copying of the material is for only one course in the school
in which the copies are made.
not more than one short poem, article, story, essay or two
excerpts may be copied from the same author, nor more than three from the same collective
work or periodical volume during one class term.
there shall be not more than nine instances of such multiple
copying for one course during one class term.
|
Also, the copying must not substitute for purchase of anthologies or
textbooks. Copying of workbooks intended to be "consumable" is also
prohibited. It is illegal for a higher authority (department chair, administrator,
etc.) to direct the copying to be done. The same item may not be repeated from term
to term. Finally, students may not be charged more than the cost of photocopying for
the materials.
Back to top of page.
Developing Multimedia
If a multimedia work is to be broadcast, placed on CD-ROM, or placed
online, then special permission for materials used is probably necessary. Some
suggestions from The Copyright Primer include having alternative materials in
mind if permission cannot be obtained, making sure that you are asking the actual
copyright owner, and expect to pay something for the rights.
Back to top of page.
Resources on the Internet
Information we place on the Internet should be marked with our intentions
regarding copyright. Still, it is not required so finding information in the
Internet does not guarantee that it is free for public use. One further complication
is that information on the Internet is frequently mirrored in more than one location.
Digital images may be easily manipulated and finding where the originator -
copyright owner - is becomes extremely difficult. In any case, users of Internet
information should still plan to pursue permission in the same way as would be necessary
for other sources. The Bellingham (WA) Schools website includes a sample
letter to request permission to republish.
Back to top of page.
Videotape
Much of the copyright law is written like it was done by a
committee of lawyers... oh, that's right - it was! The portion of
the law that addresses classroom use of videotape is Section
110(1). Here is the relevant portion:
| [P]erformance or display of a work by
instructors or pupils in the course of face-to-face teaching activities of a
nonprofit educational institution, in a classroom or similar place devoted to
instruction, unless, in the case of a motion picture or other audiovisual
work, the performance, or the display of individual images, is given by means
of a copy that was not lawfully made...and that the person responsible for the
performance knew or had reason to believe was not lawfully made...[is not an
infringement]. |
The most confusing portion of this paragraph is the section
trying to explain one key point: it is not an infringement to show a
videotape as long as you have no reason to believe that the tape being shown is
a pirated copy - not legally obtained. In slightly plainer English
explaining the entire paragraph, this says that it is NOT an infringement to
display/show a motion picture or other audiovisual work if the following
conditions are met:
-
the motion picture, videotape, etc. was legally obtained
(and is not an illegal duplicate).
-
the instructor shows the work in the course of face-to-face
teaching.
-
the display is in a non-profit educational institution (such
as a public k-12 school).
There is no need for special licensing to show copyrighted
materials in a classroom. But the videotape could not be shown to a larger
audience or a place open to the public. Also, teachers should be aware
that their use of the tape must reasonably be considered part of their
curriculum - no showings for entertainment purposes, and no transmitting the
videotape to multiple classrooms simultaneously over a building video network.
Computer Software
One interesting problem that has yet to be tested in the courts is the
fact that most computer software includes "license agreements" or the packaging
that are intended to provide greater safeguards for publishers than would be included
within copyright law. By printing these restrictions on the packages, publishers are
attempting to bind us to contract law instead of copyright law. This is of
questionable validity.
Regardless of the outcome of this issue, it is clear that software cannot
be placed on more than one machine's hard drive, booted in more than one machine's
system, etc. unless multiple copies have been pruchased or multiple licensing agreements
are purchased.
Other
Resources
Suggestions
from the Association
of American Publishers.
ProjectCool
- Developer
Zone page on Copyright.
Back to top of page.
[Session 1] [Session 2] [Session 3] [Session 4] [Session 5]
[HomePage Overview] [Top]
This site copyrighted (2005) by Dr. Blake West - Please credit when linking to
the
site!
Kansas NEA - 715 SW 10th Ave. Topeka, KS 66612.
|